QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal courts go online: free, searchable records for all Americans

S. 4667 — Open Courts Act of 2026 · Filed by John Kennedy (R-LA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 2, 2026 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Judicial Transparency Infrastructure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a unified, modernized federal court records system accessible to the public online, consolidating records currently scattered across different courts. It requires the system to be searchable, support bulk downloads and automated access, and remain free to the public; funding comes from fees on high-volume commercial users and federal agencies, with potential filing-fee increases only if those sources prove insufficient and only for filers earning over $250,000 annually.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is modernizing and centralizing federal court records into a single public-facing system with open-access design principles. While it includes funding mechanisms, these are secondary to the primary civic purpose of improving public access to judicial information.

What the text implies

  • Bulk-access and API provisions may enable large-scale data mining of court records by private companies, researchers, and journalists—potentially creating new markets for litigation analytics and legal intelligence without explicit consent frameworks.
  • The 5-year implementation deadline is ambitious for a system of this scale; delays could trigger automatic fee increases on filers, creating political pressure to rush deployment or compromise security/accessibility standards.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Legal research and litigation analytics companies; Law firms and legal service providers; Academic and nonprofit research institutions

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record