QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Bill lets utilities jump renewables in power-grid queue

S. 465 — GRID Power Act · Filed by John Hoeven (R-ND) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 6, 2025 · Hearing held

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
38/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernGrid Reliability Prioritization Mechanism

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to create new rules allowing electric utilities and grid operators to prioritize certain power generation projects in the interconnection queue—the waiting list for new power plants to connect to the grid. The bill specifically prioritizes 'dispatchable power' (power plants that can reliably produce electricity on demand) over other types of generation, and requires utilities to demonstrate that prioritization will improve grid reliability before FERC approves it.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a rulemaking directive that creates a formal process for utilities to prioritize 'dispatchable power' projects in interconnection queues. While framed as a grid-reliability measure, the mechanism functionally advantages conventional generation (fossil, nuclear) over renewables by creating a legal pathway to queue-jumping based on dispatchability criteria.

What the text implies

  • The bill defines 'dispatchable power' to include only generation capable of providing 'known and forecastable' supply on demand—a definition that systematically excludes or disadvantages variable renewables (solar, wind) even when paired with storage, potentially slowing renewable deployment and increasing long-term climate costs.
  • By allowing utilities to prioritize projects in the interconnection queue based on 'grid reliability' criteria set by the utility itself (subject only to FERC approval within 60 days), the bill creates a regulatory pathway for incumbent utilities to favor projects that compete with or displace renewable energy, potentially entrenching existing generation assets.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

conventional power generators (fossil fuel, nuclear); incumbent utilities with existing dispatchable assets; transmission operators (ISOs/RTOs) managing interconnection queues

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record