QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Pentagon and USDA team up to shield farm data from public view

S. 4607 — DOD and USDA Interagency Research Act · Filed by Jim Banks (R-IN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee

62%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
38/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
Defense-Agriculture Research Partnership…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the Department of Defense and Department of Agriculture to jointly fund research and development projects in agriculture, food security, and natural resource management with national security applications. The two departments will establish a formal agreement to award competitive grants to universities, labs, companies, and nonprofits—with private partners required to match federal funding—to develop technologies for agricultural resilience, supply chain security, wildfire prevention, and defense-related biofuels.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is establishing a joint R&D program between two federal departments with competitive grant-making. However, its most consequential provision—blanket FOIA exemption for agricultural data—is not prominently signaled in the title or summary, making it a data-secrecy rider embedded in what appears to be routine interagency coordination.

  • FOIA exemption for all agricultural data used in research, buried in subsection (c)(5). Unrelated to stated R&D coordination purpose; shields producer data from public disclosure.

What the text implies

  • Agricultural producer data collected or used in federally funded research becomes permanently exempt from FOIA requests, creating a broad secrecy carve-out that extends beyond national security to routine farm data.
  • The 'judicial deference' clause (section 5) requires courts to defer to agency interpretation of ambiguous provisions, reducing judicial oversight and making it harder for citizens or watchdogs to challenge agency decisions.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

agricultural technology companies; defense contractors (biofuel/propellant suppliers); precision agriculture firms

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record