Congress quietly subsidizes dietary supplements for the HSA-eligible few
S. 4587 — Dietary Supplements Access Act · Filed by Kevin Cramer (R-ND) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows people to use pre-tax health savings accounts (HSAs), Archer MSAs, and flexible spending arrangements to pay for dietary supplements up to $500 per year ($250 if married filing separately), treating them as qualified medical expenses. The bill defines dietary supplements using the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act definition and explicitly excludes energy drinks, sodas, and soft drinks.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a targeted tax benefit—allowing pre-tax health savings accounts to cover dietary supplements up to $500/year. This is a straightforward tax expenditure that reduces revenue and benefits supplement purchasers with access to these accounts.
What the text implies
- The $500 annual cap applies per account type (HSA, Archer MSA, FSA/HRA), potentially allowing individuals with multiple account types to exceed $500 total in tax-subsidized supplement purchases.
- The definition of 'dietary supplement' relies on the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which has a broad definition that includes many products with minimal clinical evidence of efficacy.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
dietary supplement manufacturers and retailers; HSA/FSA account administrators; workers with access to employer-sponsored health savings accounts