Congress moves to tax investment managers like wage earners, closing carried interest loophole
S. 4330 — Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act · Filed by Ron Wyden (D-OR) · 14 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 16, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill closes the 'carried interest loophole' by requiring investment fund managers and partners who receive partnership stakes as compensation for their work to pay ordinary income tax on those stakes immediately, rather than deferring taxation or treating gains as long-term capital gains. It replaces the current Section 1061 rule with a new regime that calculates a 'deemed compensation amount' based on invested capital and a specified rate (the 10-year Treasury rate plus 9 percentage points), taxing that amount annually as ordinary income while creating an offsetting long-term capital loss. The bill applies to private equity, hedge funds, real estate partnerships, and similar investment vehicles where managers receive profit-sharing interests tied to performance.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a direct tax policy change targeting a specific compensation structure used in investment management. It is not a subsidy, carve-out, or immunity grant, but rather a closure of an existing preferential tax treatment. The operative language is dense but functionally straightforward: recharacterize carried interest as ordinary income subject to annual deemed-compensation taxation.
What the text implies
- The 'deemed compensation amount' formula (specified rate × excess invested capital) may create timing mismatches between tax liability and actual cash distributions, potentially forcing managers to pay tax on unrealized gains or in years when the fund distributes no cash.
- The 10-year 'applicable period' for accelerated inclusion on disposition means early exits from partnerships trigger retroactive tax acceleration, effectively penalizing fund managers who sell stakes before the full 10-year window.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. Treasury / federal government (increased tax revenue from investment managers and fund sponsors