QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress caps crop insurance profits, mandates subsidy disclosure

S. 4215 — AFFIRM Act of 2026 · Filed by Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) · Introduced Mar 26, 2026 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
28/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernCrop Insurance Cost Control and Transparency

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to reduce federal spending on crop insurance by imposing four main restrictions: (1) requiring annual public disclosure of which farmers and ranchers receive subsidized crop insurance and how much they receive, (2) capping premium subsidies at $40,000 per person per year and denying subsidies to those with average adjusted gross income over $250,000, (3) prohibiting federal premium subsidies for harvest-price-based insurance policies starting in 2027, and (4) capping the profit margins and administrative reimbursements that private crop insurance companies can earn from the federal program. The bill primarily benefits taxpayers by reducing federal spending and increasing transparency, while imposing costs on higher-income farmers and insurance companies.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a multi-pronged cost-reduction and transparency initiative targeting federal crop insurance spending. It combines disclosure requirements, income/payment caps, policy-type restrictions, and profit-margin controls—all aimed at reducing federal outlays and increasing public accountability.

What the text implies

  • The $250,000 adjusted gross income cap may disproportionately affect larger farming operations and agribusiness entities, potentially consolidating risk toward smaller farms but also reducing federal support for mid-sized commercial operations.
  • Prohibition on harvest-price-based policies eliminates a risk-management tool for farmers but may shift demand toward other policy types, affecting the product mix and profitability of private insurers.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

U.S. federal government (reduced spending); taxpayers (lower federal outlays)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record