States gain voice in endangered species decisions — but at what cost?
S. 4146 — Local Data for Better Conservation Act · Filed by Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 19, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Endangered Species Act to require the federal government to accept and integrate state-collected data when deciding whether to list or delist species as threatened or endangered. It does not mandate that states collect data or that federal decisions follow state recommendations, only that state data be considered and incorporated into the federal listing process.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a narrow procedural change to the Endangered Species Act's listing process, requiring federal consideration of state-collected data without substantively altering the Secretary's authority or the criteria for listing decisions. It is neither deregulation nor a conservation expansion, but a shift in information sources.
What the text implies
- If 'integrate' is interpreted loosely, states with economic interests in resource extraction (logging, mining, agriculture) could submit data designed to argue against listing, and the Secretary would be required to formally incorporate it, potentially slowing or blocking protections.
- The bill does not define what 'State-collected data' means — it could include peer-reviewed science, anecdotal reports, or industry-funded studies, creating ambiguity about data quality standards.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
industries dependent on land use in species habitat (agriculture, timber, mining, energy); state wildlife agencies (if they gain influence over federal decisions)