North Dakota gets $1.5B for rural and tribal water infrastructure
S. 4040 — Dakota Water Resources Act Amendments of 2026 · Filed by John Hoeven (R-ND) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 10, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes $1.48 billion in federal funding to complete water supply projects in North Dakota and for tribal water systems on four Indian reservations (Fort Totten, Fort Berthold, Standing Rock, and Turtle Mountain). The money covers treatment plants, pipelines, rural distribution networks, and feasibility studies, with amounts indexed to account for construction cost inflation.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is authorizing federal appropriations for water supply projects. It amends an existing reclamation statute to increase funding caps and add new project authorizations—a straightforward appropriations measure with no deregulation, liability shields, or private carve-outs.
What the text implies
- Indexing clause (subsection (e)) ties all authorized amounts to engineering cost indices, meaning actual appropriations may exceed stated figures if construction costs rise—Congress will need to appropriate the indexed amounts or projects will be underfunded.
- Two-year deadline for final engineering reports (subsections (b)(1)(D)(iii) and (b)(2)(C)(iii)) creates a hard timeline; delays in feasibility studies or environmental review could compress design schedules and increase costs.
- Lake Traverse project (subsection (b)(2)(C)(ii)(V)) is contingent on Secretary's determination of technical and financial feasibility—if deemed infeasible, the $12M authorization may not be spent, creating uncertainty for that tribal nation.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill funds essential public water infrastructure serving rural communities and tribal nations that historically lack reliable drinking water access. No restrictions on citizens' rights or remedies; the mechanism is straightforward appropriation for public health and safety.
Who stands to gain
- construction contractors (water treatment plants, pipelines, pump stations)
- engineering firms (design and feasibility studies)
- rural water districts in North Dakota
- tribal water authorities (Fort Totten, Fort Berthold, Standing Rock, Turtle Mountain)
Named in the bill
Public Law 89-108 (Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program), Bureau of Reclamation, Secretary of Interior, Northwest Area Water Supply Project, Eastern North Dakota Alternate Water Supply Project, Southwest Pipeline Project, Fort Totten Indian Reservation, Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation, Lake Traverse Indian Reservation, North Dakota rural water districts
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Mar 10, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Mar 10, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
- Mar 17, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held”
- Jun 10, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $234,872 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
John Hoeven, the sponsor, reported $269,275 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Waterways Council Inc — $234,872 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,316 characters) on Jul 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“North Dakota gets $1.5B for rural and tribal water infrastructure” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4040 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.