Congress orders breakup of Big Meat to restore competition and lower prices
S. 4007 — Family Grocery and Farmer Relief Act · Filed by Chuck Schumer (D-NY) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 5, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill breaks up large meatpacking companies to restore competition and lower meat prices for consumers. It prohibits the four largest beef and pork processors from operating in multiple protein markets (beef, pork, chicken) simultaneously, requires them to divest assets, and forces foreign-owned companies like JBS and Smithfield to sell their U.S. operations. It also funds small businesses and farmer cooperatives to acquire divested plants and gives the FTC enforcement power to prevent price discrimination.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory divestiture and breakup of dominant meatpacking firms to restore competition. It is not a price-control or subsidy bill, but a structural antitrust remedy targeting market concentration.
What the text implies
- Divestiture timelines (120 days for foreign-controlled firms, 90 days for multi-protein rules) are aggressive and may force fire-sale conditions, potentially benefiting well-capitalized acquirers over small operators despite stated preference for cooperatives.
- Section 203's 10% cap on single-feedlot sourcing and private right of action (treble damages) creates new litigation exposure for packers but may also chill legitimate long-term supply contracts that benefit stable producers.
- FTC's discretion to define 'covered meatpacking enterprise' by rule (Section 3(5)(B)) and to designate additional protein categories (Section 3(10)(D)) grants significant regulatory power without explicit statutory thresholds, creating uncertainty for mid-sized firms.
- Foreign divestiture requirement (Section 302) applies only to named JBS and broadly to 'any other entity as determined by rule,' potentially exposing other foreign investors to retroactive forced sales based on future FTC rulemaking.
- Section 402 report on FTC pricing authority is advisory; bill does not grant new statutory authority to regulate retail meat prices, only directs FTC to maximize existing Section 5 and Section 406 powers—actual price relief depends on FTC enforcement discretion.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers and independent farmers gain from restored competition: lower meat prices, reduced price discrimination against small grocers, and improved bargaining power for livestock producers. Workers benefit from safer job conditions and rural communities from economic viability. The bill directly restrains corporate market power, not citizen rights.
Who stands to gain
- Farmers' cooperatives (preferred acquirers of divested assets)
- Small and mid-sized meatpacking firms (reduced competition from dominant players)
- Independent and regional meat processors (access to divested facilities)
- Worker-owned enterprises (preferred in divestiture structures)
- Small Business Administration loan recipients (Section 501 funding)
Named in the bill
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), JBS S.A. (foreign-controlled beef processor), Smithfield Foods / WH Group (foreign-controlled pork processor), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Small Business Administration (SBA), Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, Federal Trade Commission Act, Beef, pork, and poultry markets
Where it stands
13 cosponsors: 12 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Mar 5, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Mar 5, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S883-887)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $17,320,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 2 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Chuck Schumer, the sponsor, reported $141,375 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $16,950,000 on 1 filing
- Cargill Inc — $330,000 on 1 filing
- Cargill, Incorporated — $40,000 on 1 filing
- Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment — $0 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (34,936 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders breakup of Big Meat to restore competition and lower prices” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s4007 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.