Federal safety standards for e-bike batteries, but industry writes the rules
S. 389 — Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act · Filed by Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 4, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to adopt three existing industry safety standards for lithium-ion batteries used in e-bikes, e-scooters, and similar light electric vehicles as mandatory federal consumer product safety rules within 180 days. Future revisions to these standards automatically become federal law unless the CPSC objects within 90 days, and the CPSC must report to Congress in 5 years on fires, explosions, and other hazards involving these batteries.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is establishing mandatory federal safety standards for lithium-ion batteries in consumer micromobility products, a straightforward regulatory measure aimed at reducing fire and explosion hazards.
What the text implies
- The bill delegates standard-setting authority to private standard-setting organizations (ANSI/CAN/UL), which means future battery safety rules may be shaped by industry input rather than purely public-interest deliberation.
- The 90-day CPSC veto window for revised standards is relatively short and places the burden on the agency to actively object; passive acceptance means industry revisions become law automatically.
- Manufacturers of lithium-ion batteries and micromobility devices (e-bikes, e-scooters) gain regulatory clarity and a level playing field, but also face compliance costs that may be passed to consumers.
- The 5-year reporting requirement creates a data trail on battery failures but does not mandate corrective action, leaving the CPSC to decide whether to revisit standards based on incident data.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers gain enforceable safety standards for lithium-ion batteries in micromobility devices, reducing fire and explosion risk. The automatic adoption of industry standards with CPSC oversight provides a baseline protection without requiring lengthy rulemaking, though the mechanism delegates standard-setting authority to private standard-setting bodies.
Who stands to gain
- lithium-ion battery manufacturers
- e-bike and e-scooter manufacturers
- testing and certification bodies
Named in the bill
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), ANSI/CAN/UL 2271, ANSI/CAN/UL 2849, ANSI/CAN/UL 2272, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals), BALL (Ball Corporation), PKG (Packaging Corp of America), PAAS (Pan American Silver Corp), AMCR (Amcor plc)
Where it stands
5 cosponsors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats.
- Feb 4, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 4, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
- Mar 12, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
12 lobbying clients named this bill on 18 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,776,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 93% of bills with at least one filing.
Kirsten Gillibrand, the sponsor, reported $172,178 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association — $3,540,000 on 2 filings
- Consumer Technology Association — $1,370,000 on 1 filing
- Doordash, Inc. — $750,000 on 1 filing
- Ulse Inc. D/b/a Ul Standards & Engagement — $300,000 on 2 filings
- Flex Association — $210,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,619 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal safety standards for e-bike batteries, but industry writes the rules” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s389 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.