Congress orders Medicare to show its spending cards—by county, plan type, and patient.
S. 3848 — Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2026 · Filed by Tim Scott (R-SC) · Introduced Feb 11, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the federal government to publish detailed Medicare spending data broken down by county, demographic group, and insurance type starting in 2027. It mandates the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) to analyze and publicly report how much Medicare Advantage plans cost compared to traditional Medicare, with full methodology transparency and public comment periods. Citizens and researchers gain access to granular spending information that was previously unavailable or scattered.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is mandatory publication of Medicare expenditure data and comparative analysis. It is fundamentally a transparency and accountability measure, not a reimbursement change or coverage restriction.
What the text implies
- Detailed county-level and demographic breakdowns may expose regional disparities in Medicare spending, potentially triggering political pressure for reimbursement adjustments or policy changes that could affect provider networks and insurance plan design.
- Mandatory MedPAC analysis comparing Medicare Advantage to fee-for-service, with explicit instruction to exclude 'favorable selection' bias, may shift the narrative around MA plan value and could influence future payment policy or enrollment incentives.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health data analytics and business intelligence firms; policy research organizations and think tanks; academic medical centers and health services research institutions