Congress moves to strip states of power to mandate clean energy
S. 3839 — Ratepayer Affordability and Transparency in Energy Act of 2026 · Filed by Tom Cotton (R-AR) · Introduced Feb 11, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill strips states of the power to set renewable energy standards or require utilities to source electricity from clean energy sources. It preempts state climate mandates like renewable portfolio standards, preventing states from requiring a percentage of electricity to come from renewables or conditioning market participation on meeting such standards. States can still own renewable facilities themselves, but cannot mandate that private utilities or the broader electricity market meet clean-energy targets.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal takeover of electricity regulation, stripping states of their traditional authority to set energy standards. It is framed as a grid-reliability measure but functions as a deregulation of renewable-energy mandates—a shift of power from states to the federal level and, indirectly, to incumbent fossil-fuel and nuclear generators.
What the text implies
- The bill's 'grid reliability' rationale is inverted: renewable portfolio standards have been shown to improve grid stability by diversifying fuel sources and reducing exposure to volatile fossil-fuel prices. Preempting them may actually increase grid fragility.
- The savings clause (subsection c) permits states to own renewable facilities but not to mandate their use—a distinction that favors incumbent utilities over state-directed clean-energy transition, since utilities have no incentive to deploy renewables if they cannot be required to do so.
- Preemption applies to 'any requirement, standard, mandate, or program' tied to renewable percentages, which may void existing state renewable portfolio standards retroactively, creating legal uncertainty for utilities and renewable-energy investors who relied on state mandates.
- The bill does not address federal renewable-energy incentives (tax credits, production subsidies), meaning fossil-fuel and nuclear generators retain federal support while renewables lose state-level mandates—an asymmetric deregulation favoring incumbent fuels.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose state-level tools to reduce carbon emissions and transition to cheaper renewable energy. Preempting renewable portfolio standards removes a proven mechanism states use to lower long-term electricity costs by scaling renewables; it also eliminates state climate accountability. The bill's framing of renewables as a grid-reliability threat contradicts evidence that renewables stabilize grids and reduce fuel-price volatility.
Who stands to gain
- fossil-fuel generators and utilities
- nuclear power operators
- incumbent electricity providers
- coal and natural-gas producers
Named in the bill
U.S. Senate, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, State governments, Utilities and electricity providers, Renewable energy sector
Where it stands
- Feb 11, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 11, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $470,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Tom Cotton, the sponsor, reported $1,292,206 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Bloom Energy — $470,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,853 characters) on Apr 16, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to strip states of power to mandate clean energy” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3839 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.