Congress moves to bar federal officials from suing the government for damages
S. 3817 — Stop Presidential Embezzlement Act · Filed by Ron Wyden (D-OR) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 10, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill imposes a 100% tax on damages that the President, Vice President, senior Executive Schedule officials, and Members of Congress receive from civil lawsuits filed against the United States — effectively confiscating any settlement or judgment award to these officials. The bill applies retroactively to any such damages received after enactment and extends the tax to family members related to covered officials.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is to prevent federal officials from collecting damages in litigation against the U.S. government by taxing such awards at 100%, eliminating any financial incentive for self-dealing litigation. This is a structural anti-corruption device, not a revenue measure.
What the text implies
- The 100% tax rate may chill legitimate claims by federal officials who suffer genuine harm (e.g., wrongful termination, constitutional violations) during their service, since any recovery is entirely forfeited to the government.
- Extension of the tax to family members (via section 267 relatedness) may create perverse incentives for officials to assign claims to relatives or structure settlements to avoid the tax, increasing litigation complexity.
- The bill applies retroactively ('after the date of enactment'), potentially capturing damages already awarded or in settlement negotiations, creating retroactive tax liability and possible due-process concerns.
- No carve-out exists for claims arising from official duties or constitutional violations — a President sued for defamation during office, or a Member of Congress sued for retaliation, would lose 100% of any recovery.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill restricts federal officials' ability to profit from litigation against the government they serve, closing a potential conflict of interest and self-dealing loophole. However, the mechanism is crude — a 100% tax on damages may deter legitimate claims by officials who suffer genuine harm, creating a mixed trade-off between accountability and access to justice.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. Treasury (increased tax revenue from confiscated damages)
Named in the bill
President of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Executive Schedule Level I officials, Members of Congress, Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Treasury, Section 267 (related persons), Section 5312 (Executive Schedule)
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 4 Democrats.
- Feb 10, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Feb 10, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,172 characters) on Aug 11, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to bar federal officials from suing the government for damages” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3817 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.