Feds can now be sued directly for officer misconduct—no agency approval needed
S. 3803 — Right to Redress Act · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Feb 9, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes the requirement that people injured by federal law enforcement officers must file administrative claims with federal agencies before suing the U.S. government for damages. Instead, injured parties can go directly to federal court, and if they request it, their case will be heard by a jury rather than a judge alone. The bill applies to claims arising from negligent or wrongful acts by any federal law enforcement officer acting within their job duties.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to expand access to federal court and jury trial for citizens harmed by federal law enforcement, removing administrative gatekeeping and strengthening individual remedies against government misconduct.
What the text implies
- Removal of the administrative-claim requirement may increase federal litigation volume and costs to the U.S. government, potentially affecting federal budgets and agency resources.
- Jury-trial availability in these cases may produce more unpredictable outcomes and higher damage awards than administrative or bench-trial processes, shifting risk to the federal government.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar (increased litigation and contingency-fee opportunities); expert witnesses and litigation support services