Congress ties highway funding to immigration enforcement, punishing sanctuary states
S. 3773 — Enforce Immigration or Lose Transportation Act · Filed by Tom Cotton (R-AR) · Introduced Feb 4, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill withholds federal highway funding from states that do not require proof of lawful immigration status for driver's licenses, restrict information-sharing with federal immigration authorities, or refuse to honor ICE detainers. States lose 5% of highway funding in the first year of noncompliance and 10% in subsequent years, though funds are restored if compliance is achieved mid-fiscal-year.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is fiscal coercion: it weaponizes federal highway appropriations to force state compliance with federal immigration enforcement priorities, bypassing state legislative authority over driver licensing and local law-enforcement policy.
What the text implies
- States with noncompliant policies face cascading infrastructure decay: 5–10% highway funding loss compounds over years, disproportionately harming rural and lower-income communities dependent on federal road maintenance.
- The bill conflates driver-license verification (a state administrative function) with immigration enforcement (a federal function), but does not require states to perform immigration enforcement—only to share data and honor detainers, effectively deputizing state custody systems.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens in noncompliant states face degraded road infrastructure and public transit due to withheld federal highway funding, while the bill's stated safety rationale lacks empirical support. The mechanism coerces state immigration enforcement policies through fiscal punishment rather than democratic deliberation, shifting control of state licensing and law-enforcement priorities to federal conditions.