Western water bill funds infrastructure but tilts toward big irrigation districts
S. 3738 — MORE WATER Act · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · Introduced Jan 29, 2026 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
The MORE WATER Act authorizes $1.7 billion in federal grants (2028–2032) for water infrastructure projects in western states, including large-scale water recycling, conveyance systems, and environmental restoration. Projects must meet cost-sharing requirements (50% federal for most projects, up to 50% for multi-benefit projects serving low-income drinking water or environmental goals), and the bill deauthorizes inactive Bureau of Reclamation projects that have received no funding in 8+ years unless Congress, the Secretary, or a non-federal sponsor intervenes.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to reauthorize and expand federal grant programs for water recycling, conveyance, and environmental restoration in western Reclamation States. It is primarily a spending and authorization bill, not a deregulation or carve-out.
What the text implies
- The conveyance program's 50% cost-share requirement may be unaffordable for rural or tribal water systems, effectively limiting eligibility to well-capitalized irrigation districts and municipalities, concentrating federal benefit among larger entities.
- Multi-benefit projects are incentivized but not mandated for projects under $800M; the 50% target for smaller projects is a soft floor, allowing the majority of federal funding to flow to single-benefit (water supply) conveyance projects that primarily serve agricultural and commercial users.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
irrigation districts; water utilities and municipalities; engineering and construction firms