QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence
Full Simple

Federal water recycling gets a boost; inactive projects face automatic deauthorization

S. 3738 — MORE WATER Act · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · Introduced Jan 29, 2026 · Reported out

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Water Infrastructure Reauthorization and…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill reauthorizes and expands federal water recycling and reuse programs, increases funding caps for water infrastructure projects, establishes a new Water Conveyance Improvement Program, and creates an automatic deauthorization process for inactive Bureau of Reclamation projects that have received no funding for 8+ years. It benefits water-stressed states and communities by unlocking federal investment in water recycling, habitat restoration, and dam operations improvements, while streamlining the backlog of stalled projects.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is reauthorizing and expanding existing water recycling and habitat restoration programs while establishing a transparent deauthorization process for inactive projects. It is primarily a technical amendment to existing water law, not a new regulatory regime or major policy shift.

What the text implies

  • The deauthorization process is automatic after 2 years unless Congress acts—this shifts the burden from project sponsors to Congress to affirmatively preserve projects, potentially accelerating the removal of politically weak or locally unpopular projects.
  • The Secretary's discretion to exclude projects as 'vitally important' is broad and undefined, creating potential for selective enforcement based on political or regional priorities.
  • Increased funding caps and extended reauthorizations may create expectation of sustained federal investment, potentially straining appropriations in future years if demand exceeds budget.
  • The bill's focus on habitat restoration and endangered species (Chinook salmon, steelhead) in California and Utah may disproportionately benefit those states' water users and environmental constituencies.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary citizens in water-stressed regions gain access to expanded federal funding for water recycling, reuse, and habitat restoration—critical infrastructure for drought resilience and endangered species protection. The deauthorization of inactive projects reduces bureaucratic waste and redirects resources to projects with real public benefit, improving transparency and accountability in federal water spending.

Who stands to gain

  • water utilities and municipal water agencies
  • construction and engineering firms (habitat restoration, dam improvements)
  • agricultural water users (recycling and reuse infrastructure)
  • environmental nonprofits and consulting firms (habitat restoration, monitoring)

Named in the bill

Bureau of Reclamation, Secretary of the Interior, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN), Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act, Central Utah Project, Central Valley Project, Shasta Dam and Reservoir, Sacramento River, Great Salt Lake, Endangered Species Act of 1973, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — and 1 more

Where it stands

  • Jan 29, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Jan 29, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.”
  • Mar 17, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held”
  • Jul 29, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a…”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

6 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $550,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 14 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 82% of bills with at least one filing.

Alex Padilla, the sponsor, reported $176,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Association of California Water Agencies — $250,000 on 2 filings
  • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California — $190,000 on 1 filing
  • Eastern Municipal Water District — $50,000 on 1 filing
  • City of Sacramento — $20,000 on 1 filing
  • Los Angeles County Sanitation District — $20,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (8,564 characters) on Aug 9, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Federal water recycling gets a boost; inactive projects face automatic deauthorization” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3738 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.