Medicare now pays for emergency care without the ambulance ride
S. 3730 — Emergency Medical Services Reimbursement for On-Scene Care and Support Act · Filed by Peter Welch (D-VT) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands Medicare coverage of ambulance services to include on-scene emergency medical care that does not involve transporting the patient to a hospital. Currently, Medicare only reimburses ambulance services when they include transportation; this bill requires Medicare to pay for ambulance services (such as on-scene stabilization, assessment, or treatment) even when no transport occurs, at a rate comparable to transport-inclusive services, starting January 1, 2027.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward expansion of Medicare's definition of covered ambulance services to include non-transport emergency care. It is a coverage mandate, not a deregulation, subsidy, or carve-out.
What the text implies
- Reimbursement rate parity ('comparable to transport reimbursement') may incentivize ambulance providers to bill for on-scene services even when transport would be clinically appropriate, potentially affecting emergency response patterns and patient outcomes.
- The bill does not specify whether Medicare will pay for duplicate services (e.g., if a patient receives on-scene care from one provider and then transport from another), creating potential for billing disputes or overpayment.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
ambulance service providers; emergency medical services (EMS) agencies; private ambulance companies