QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress demands a measurable veteran success plan—with veto power.

S. 3726 — National Veterans Strategy Act of 2026 · Filed by Jerry Moran (R-KS) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2026 · Hearing held

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Veterans Accountability & Coordination…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires the President to define what 'veteran success' means by establishing metrics across seven areas (physical health, mental health, spiritual health, economic security, education, family/social engagement, and civic engagement), then develop and submit a comprehensive National Veterans Strategy to Congress every four years that coordinates federal, state, local, nonprofit, and private resources to help veterans meet those metrics. Congress can disapprove the strategy within 60 days using an expedited procedure, and the President must report annually on implementation progress.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is procedural and accountability-focused: it mandates presidential definition of veteran success, requires a coordinated strategy, and gives Congress disapproval power. It is not a spending bill, benefit expansion, or agency creation—it is a governance and transparency instrument requiring the executive to articulate and implement a coherent, measurable approach to veteran well-being.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not appropriate funds or mandate new spending; implementation depends on existing agency budgets and voluntary private-sector participation. Effectiveness hinges on whether agencies actually realign resources or merely report compliance.
  • The 60-day congressional disapproval window is tight; a strategy could be blocked only if Congress acts with unusual speed and unity, making disapproval a high bar in practice.
  • Metrics are defined by the President in consultation with stakeholders, not by Congress—Congress can reject the strategy but cannot directly shape the metrics themselves, limiting legislative control over what 'success' means.
  • The bill requires federal agencies to incorporate metrics into strategic plans and apply them uniformly, but does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance, potentially weakening accountability.
  • Private-sector participation is voluntary and undefined; the bill does not require companies to participate or align with the strategy, so private-sector coordination may be aspirational rather than binding.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Veterans and their families gain a coordinated, transparent, congressionally-accountable strategy designed to improve measurable well-being across seven life domains. The bill creates enforceable metrics, annual reporting, and congressional oversight—strengthening accountability and reducing fragmentation in veteran services. No restrictions on veteran rights or benefits; the bill only adds coordination and transparency.

Named in the bill

President of the United States, Congress, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Small Business Administration, State governments, Local governments, Tribal organizations, Veterans service organizations — and 3 more

Where it stands

7 cosponsors: 4 Republicans, 3 Democrats.

  • Jan 29, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Jan 29, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs”
  • Apr 29, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $994,387 in lobbying spend. A filing names 26 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.

Jerry Moran, the sponsor, reported $396,050 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Military Officers Association of America — $854,387 on 1 filing
  • Syracuse University — $140,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (15,867 characters) on Sep 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 14,986 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-09-26.

“Congress demands a measurable veteran success plan—with veto power.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3726 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record