States get to set lending rates — or not. Consumers lose federal floor.
S. 3721 — Empowering States' Rights To Protect Consumers Act of 2026 · Filed by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2026 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Truth in Lending Act to allow each state to set its own maximum interest rate (APR) cap for consumer credit products like personal loans, credit cards, and auto loans — overriding any federal floor. A consumer in a state with a 36% cap would be protected at 36%; a consumer in a state with no cap would have no federal protection. The bill empowers state legislatures to regulate lending rates within their borders.
Why we flagged it
The bill's title emphasizes 'States' Rights' and consumer protection, but its operative mechanism removes federal APR constraints and delegates rate-setting to states. This is a devolution of federal consumer protection authority, not a strengthening of it — the civic effect depends on whether states choose to fill the gap.
What the text implies
- States with no usury laws or high caps will see no change in lending rates; consumers there lose federal protection without gaining state protection.
- The bill creates regulatory arbitrage: lenders may relocate or restructure operations to serve consumers in high-cap or no-cap states, concentrating predatory lending in deregulated jurisdictions.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
consumer finance companies; payday lenders; credit card issuers