QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress mandates detention standards, bans child detention, phases out private prisons

S. 3702 — Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 11 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 27, 2026 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Detention Standards and Accountability

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes minimum standards for immigration detention facilities operated by the Department of Homeland Security, based on American Bar Association civil detention standards. It requires annual unannounced inspections, public reporting of facility compliance, and mandates the phase-out of private for-profit detention contracts within three years, replacing them with government-operated facilities. The bill also restricts detention of children under 18, creates alternatives to detention through community-based case management, eliminates mandatory detention in most cases, and establishes a presumption of release with strict conditions for continued detention.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is establishing enforceable detention standards, oversight, and transparency requirements for immigration detention facilities, with a structural shift away from private for-profit detention toward government operation and community-based alternatives.

What the text implies

  • The phase-out of private detention contracts may create significant operational and financial burden on DHS, potentially requiring substantial appropriations for facility construction and staffing that are not explicitly funded in the bill.
  • The presumption of release and strict custody determination standards may substantially reduce the detained population, with downstream effects on immigration court scheduling, removal processing timelines, and ICE operational capacity.
  • The community-based case management program's success depends on DHS contracting with nonprofit organizations; if such organizations are unavailable or unwilling to participate, the alternatives-to-detention framework may collapse.
  • The prohibition on electronic surveillance as an alternative to detention removes a monitoring tool that some jurisdictions may have relied on; the bill does not specify what supervision mechanisms replace it.
  • Mandatory legal orientation and access to counsel provisions may increase immigration court hearing complexity and duration, potentially straining judicial resources.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Ordinary people detained by immigration authorities gain enforceable standards, regular inspections, public transparency, access to counsel, and a legal presumption favoring release over detention. The elimination of private for-profit detention removes a financial incentive to detain people longer, and the prohibition on child detention and solitary confinement directly protects vulnerable populations. These are accountability and rights protections, not corporate subsidies.

Who stands to gain

  • nonprofit organizations operating case management and legal orientation programs
  • immigration legal service providers
  • federal contractors hired to construct and operate government-owned detention facilities

Named in the bill

Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Health and Human Services, Inspector General of DHS, American Bar Association, The Joint Commission, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, House Committee on Homeland Security, ARE (referenced in mapped stocks)

Where it stands

11 cosponsors: 10 Democrats, 1 Independents.

  • Jan 27, 2026 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Jan 27, 2026 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

3 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,460,651 in lobbying spend. A filing names 16 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.

Cory Booker, the sponsor, reported $496,300 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Friends Committee on National Legislation — $1,000,000 on 1 filing
  • Catholic Health Association of the United States — $240,651 on 1 filing
  • Amnesty International of the USA Inc — $220,000 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (34,862 characters) on Aug 14, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress mandates detention standards, bans child detention, phases out private prisons” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3702 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.