Carbon tax meets industrial subsidy: a $60-per-ton charge on imports, price supports for domestic ma
S. 3523 — Clean Competition Act · Filed by Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 17, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a carbon border adjustment mechanism—a charge on imported goods and domestic production based on their carbon intensity. Starting in 2026, importers and domestic producers of carbon-intensive goods (steel, cement, chemicals, etc.) pay a fee if their product's emissions exceed a declining baseline; the fee starts at $60 per metric ton of CO2-equivalent and rises annually. Exporters of these goods receive rebates. The bill also funds domestic industrial decarbonization grants and 'contracts for difference' (price supports) to help U.S. manufacturers compete globally while reducing emissions, and authorizes the President to negotiate 'carbon club' agreements with trading partners that meet labor, environmental, and emissions-reduction standards.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a carbon intensity charge (tax) on imports and domestic production, paired with substantial government grants and price-support contracts (subsidies) for domestic manufacturers. The character is neither purely regulatory nor purely fiscal—it is a hybrid carbon pricing + industrial policy instrument.
What the text implies
- The 'contracts for difference' program (Section 2(3)) is a price-support mechanism that guarantees eligible manufacturers a minimum revenue per unit of output, effectively shielding them from market competition and potentially locking in above-market prices for consumers of steel, cement, chemicals, and other inputs.
- The bill grants the President broad authority to negotiate 'carbon club' agreements and waive charges for trading partners, creating significant discretionary power over which countries and industries receive preferential treatment—potentially weaponizing trade policy.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
domestic steel, cement, and chemical manufacturers (via carbon intensity charges on imports and pric; renewable energy and energy-storage companies (via grants for advanced industrial technology); engineering and construction firms (via retrofitting and new facility construction contracts)