QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Feds invest $250M in forest restoration, microgrids, and wildfire workforce—with strings attached

S. 350 — Wildfire Emergency Act of 2025 · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 30, 2025 · Reported out

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Wildfire Resilience and Workforce…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes federal programs to reduce wildfire risk through landscape-scale forest restoration, community resilience infrastructure, and workforce development. The Secretary of Agriculture can enter into conservation finance agreements with public and private entities (up to 20 agreements, $250 million total) to remove hazardous fuels and small-diameter timber; the Department of Energy will fund microgrids and backup power for critical facilities; and the bill creates training centers, workforce grants, and community capacity grants (prioritizing disadvantaged communities) to build expertise and local engagement in forest management and fire mitigation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is federal investment in forest restoration, community infrastructure, and training—a public-sector capacity-building and risk-mitigation program. Conservation finance agreements are a financing tool, not the primary purpose; they enable private capital to flow into restoration work under federal oversight.

What the text implies

  • Conservation finance agreements may create long-term federal payment obligations contingent on future appropriations; if funding lapses, the government must pay cancellation costs (up to $50M per agreement), potentially locking in spending across multiple fiscal years.
  • The bill authorizes the Secretary to waive or adjust the $13,000 average weatherization cost cap 'if necessary,' creating discretionary authority that could expand program costs without explicit congressional reauthorization.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Forest restoration contractors and timber operators; Renewable energy and microgrid equipment manufacturers; Nonprofit and community-based organizations (eligible for grants)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record