QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

USDA must buy from small farms and sustainable producers—here's how

S. 3471 — EFFECTIVE Food Procurement Act · Filed by Ed Markey (D-MA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 15, 2025 · Hearing held

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Food System Equity and Sustainability…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the U.S. Department of Agriculture to prioritize purchasing food from small farms, beginning farmers, veterans, socially disadvantaged producers, and certified sustainable/organic operations when buying food for federal programs like school lunches and food banks. It requires USDA to track and report what percentage of its food budget goes to these categories, establish a pilot program that evaluates bids based on broader 'best value' criteria (including worker protections and climate impact, not just price), and provide grants and technical assistance to help small and disadvantaged producers meet federal vendor requirements.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to reorient federal food procurement away from lowest-cost commodity purchasing toward a multi-criteria 'best value' model that prioritizes equity, sustainability, worker welfare, and climate impact. It is fundamentally a values-driven procurement reform, not a subsidy or carve-out.

What the text implies

  • Procurement preferences for small/disadvantaged producers may increase food costs to USDA programs in the short term, potentially raising school lunch or food-bank operating expenses unless offset by appropriations.
  • The 'best value' pilot program's evaluation criteria are not yet defined—Congress delegates this to USDA in consultation with stakeholders, creating regulatory uncertainty and potential for future lobbying over what counts as 'value.'

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

small and medium-sized farms; beginning farmers and veteran farmers; socially disadvantaged agricultural producers

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record