QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to deregulate silencers, strip law enforcement tracking tools

S. 345 — SHUSH Act · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 30, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
2
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernFirearm Deregulation & Tax Relief

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill removes federal regulation of firearm silencers by striking them from the National Firearms Act's definition of regulated devices, eliminating the $200 tax and registration requirement, and preempting state laws that tax or register silencers. It also removes silencers from federal criminal penalties for equipped firearms and exempts them from Consumer Product Safety Commission oversight.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is removal of federal taxation, registration, and regulatory oversight of silencers—a direct deregulation and tax cut for silencer owners and manufacturers. The title 'SHUSH Act' frames it as hearing protection, but the bill's actual effect is regulatory and tax relief, not a public-health measure.

  • Sections 926B(e)(3) and 926C(e)(1)(C) amendments remove silencer restrictions for active and retired law enforcement—unrelated to general silencer deregulation.
  • Section 6 exempts silencers from Consumer Product Safety Commission oversight—a separate regulatory regime unrelated to NFA tax/registration.

What the text implies

  • Silencers become untraceable in interstate commerce; law enforcement loses registration data used to link silencers to crime scenes and illegal weapons trafficking.
  • State and local governments lose tax revenue and regulatory authority; preemption clause bars any state-level tracking or taxation, even for public-safety purposes.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

silencer manufacturers; firearms accessory retailers; silencer owners (tax relief)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record