DoD must pay for contaminated well water near military bases
S. 3445 — A bill to require the provision of alternative drinking water to households whose private drinking water is contaminated with perfluorooctanesulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid substances from activities of the Department of Defense. · Filed by Gary Peters (D-MI) · Introduced Dec 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Department of Defense to provide alternative drinking water (bottled water, connection to public systems, or filtration) to households whose private wells have been contaminated with PFOA/PFOS chemicals from DoD military installations. The requirement applies only to households downgradient from a military base where contamination exceeded EPA limits and at least one other household in the same community is already receiving such water from DoD.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a straightforward environmental accountability measure requiring the DoD to remediate drinking water contamination it caused. It is not a tax provision, appropriation, or deregulation—it is a mandate to provide a specific public health remedy.
What the text implies
- The 'same community' eligibility trigger (subsection (a)(3)) may create a perverse incentive: households in contaminated areas may not receive water until another household in their community is already enrolled, potentially delaying relief for early-identified contamination.
- The Secretary's discretion to determine whether contamination 'resulted solely from activities of the Department of Defense' may become a litigation flashpoint if DoD argues contamination is from mixed sources, narrowing the pool of eligible households.
- The exception for communities where all affected households are connected to municipal water systems (subsection (c)(1)) may leave isolated households without remedy if municipal connection is infeasible or prohibitively expensive.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Households with contaminated private wells gain access to safe drinking water at government expense, shifting the cost of remediation from affected families to the responsible federal agency. The requirement is narrowly tailored to contamination caused by DoD activities, ensuring accountability for environmental harm.
Named in the bill
Department of Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Secretary of Defense, Military installations, PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), PFOS (perfluorooctanesulfonic acid), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Safe Drinking Water Act
Where it stands
- Dec 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Dec 11, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,479 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“DoD must pay for contaminated well water near military bases” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3445 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.