Congress lets insurers dodge state health rules to sell cheaper plans
S. 3434 — Health Coverage Across State Lines Act · Filed by Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) · Introduced Dec 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows health insurance companies to sell individual health insurance across state lines by choosing one 'primary state' whose insurance rules govern their policies nationwide, while exempting them from most insurance regulations in other 'secondary states' where they operate. Consumers in secondary states would receive a notice that their policy is less expensive because it skips many state-mandated benefits and consumer protections, but the bill preserves some baseline safeguards like fraud prevention and claims-handling standards.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is regulatory arbitrage: it allows insurers to escape state insurance mandates by designating a single primary state, effectively creating a race-to-the-bottom in consumer protections. While framed as 'cooperative' and efficiency-driven, it functionally deregulates individual health insurance in secondary states.
What the text implies
- Insurers can cherry-pick the most permissive state's rules and apply them nationwide, incentivizing states to weaken insurance standards to attract insurer headquarters.
- Consumers in secondary states lose access to state-mandated benefits (e.g., mental health parity, fertility coverage, contraception) without explicit consent—the notice warns of this but does not prevent it.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
health insurance issuers (especially those seeking to minimize regulatory burden); insurers domiciled in or relocating to low-regulation states; reinsurers and risk-retention groups