Bill shields police from lawsuits while criminalizing violence against them
S. 3366 — Back the Blue Act of 2025 · Filed by John Cornyn (R-TX) · 38 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates new federal crimes targeting violence against law enforcement officers, judges, and first responders, with mandatory minimum sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment or death. It also restricts federal habeas corpus relief for state prisoners convicted of killing public safety officers, limits civil damages available to people injured during arrests for felonies or crimes of violence, and expands firearm-carrying rights for law enforcement officers in federal facilities.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is dual: it creates new federal crimes protecting officers from violence (a straightforward public-safety measure) while simultaneously narrowing civil liability and habeas corpus remedies available to citizens—a structural asymmetry that favors law enforcement accountability over citizen accountability.
- Section 5 restricts civil damages for people injured during felony arrests, unrelated to the bill's stated purpose of protecting officers from violence.
What the text implies
- Section 5 bars civil damages (except out-of-pocket costs) for anyone injured 'in the course of' a felony arrest, even if the injury was caused by officer misconduct—this creates a broad immunity for law enforcement actions during arrests for serious crimes.
- Habeas corpus restrictions in Section 4 apply retroactively to cases pending on enactment, immediately narrowing review rights for state prisoners without grandfathering existing claims.
- The 'federally funded public safety officer' definition ties federal protection to receipt of federal funds, creating incentive for state/local agencies to accept federal money to gain federal criminal protections—a form of conditional federalization.
- Firearm-carrying provisions (Section 6) allow law enforcement to carry weapons in federal court facilities and buildings, expanding armed presence in civilian spaces without explicit public debate on that expansion.
- The bill does not create a corresponding federal crime for law enforcement killing citizens, creating one-directional criminal protection.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill protects law enforcement from violence (a public safety benefit), but simultaneously narrows civil remedies available to citizens injured during arrests or police actions, and restricts federal court review of state convictions—creating asymmetric accountability where officers gain protection while citizens lose avenues for redress.
Named in the bill
Federal law enforcement officers, State and local law enforcement, Federal judges and prosecutors, First responders (firefighters, paramedics), Department of Justice, Attorney General, Federal courts, State courts
Where it stands
38 cosponsors: 38 Republicans.
- Dec 4, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Dec 4, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $90,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 46 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
John Cornyn, the sponsor, reported $2,042,484 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Peace Officers Research Association of California — $50,000 on 1 filing
- Sergeants Benevolent Association of New York City — $40,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (16,679 characters) on Oct 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,388 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-21.
“Bill shields police from lawsuits while criminalizing violence against them” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3366 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.