Airlines must now pay passengers for delays and cancellations
S. 3347 — Flight Delay and Cancellation Compensation Act · Filed by Mark Kelly (D-AZ) · 16 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 4, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Department of Transportation to establish rules forcing airlines to compensate passengers when flights are cancelled or significantly delayed due to the airline's fault. Passengers would receive cash compensation ($300–$750 depending on delay length), free rebooking on another flight, and reimbursement for meals, hotels, and ground transportation during overnight delays. The bill sets a 90-day timeline for the DOT to form a committee to develop recommendations, then 18 months to issue interim rules, modeled on Canadian and European passenger-protection standards.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory consumer-protection standard requiring airlines to compensate passengers for service failures. It is functionally a regulatory mandate on a specific industry, modeled on existing international passenger-protection regimes.
What the text implies
- The bill references but does not fully incorporate Section 512 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, creating potential ambiguity about which standard (this bill's or the prior law's) governs 'significantly delayed' and other key terms.
- The interim final rule ($750 flat compensation) differs from the tiered structure ($300–$600) recommended to the committee, creating a gap between the interim standard and the final rule that may confuse passengers and airlines during the transition.
- The bill does not specify how airlines will determine 'direct attributability' to the carrier (vs. weather, mechanical, or force majeure), leaving room for disputes and potential regulatory capture during rulemaking.
- Foreign air carriers are explicitly included, which may create competitive pressure on U.S. carriers but also exposes foreign carriers to U.S. liability—potential trade friction or reciprocal pressure from other nations.
- The bill mandates rebooking 'at no additional cost' on any carrier or alternative transport, but does not address how airlines will coordinate with competitors or who bears the cost of rebooking on a rival carrier.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary travelers gain enforceable rights to cash compensation and amenity reimbursement for airline-caused disruptions—protections currently absent in U.S. law. Airlines bear the cost of these obligations, but the public benefit (reduced out-of-pocket losses, clearer accountability) outweighs the private cost to carriers.
Who stands to gain
- hotel and lodging operators (increased bookings from airline-mandated overnight accommodations)
- ground transportation services (increased demand for airport transfers)
- meal and food service providers (airline-mandated meal credits)
Named in the bill
Department of Transportation (DOT), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Air carriers (U.S. and foreign), Airport operators, Consumer protection organizations, Canadian Transportation Agency, European Parliament, Montreal Convention
Where it stands
16 cosponsors: 15 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Dec 4, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Dec 4, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,025,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 15 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Mark Kelly, the sponsor, reported $48,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- International Council of Shopping Centers — $1,010,000 on 2 filings
- Greenville-spartanburg Airport — $15,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,552 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Airlines must now pay passengers for delays and cancellations” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3347 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.