Pipeline approvals now must weigh climate and pollution on vulnerable communities
S. 3324 — FERC Greenhouse Gas and Environmental Justice Policy Act of 2025 · Filed by Richard Durbin (D-IL) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to evaluate greenhouse gas emissions and environmental justice impacts when deciding whether to approve natural gas pipeline projects. Applicants must submit mitigation plans, and FERC must weigh climate and community health effects against project benefits—presuming projects emitting 100,000+ metric tons of CO2 equivalent annually have significant climate impacts. Communities bearing disproportionate pollution burdens gain a formal voice in the approval process.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to embed climate and environmental justice analysis into FERC's pipeline-approval process, shifting the regulatory burden from communities to applicants and requiring explicit justification when projects proceed despite significant harms.
What the text implies
- FERC approval timelines may lengthen as applicants develop mitigation proposals and FERC conducts deeper environmental justice and GHG analysis, potentially delaying or raising costs for natural gas infrastructure projects.
- The 100,000 metric-ton CO2-equivalent threshold creates a bright-line presumption of significance, which may effectively block or severely condition many new or expanded pipelines in or near environmental justice communities.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
renewable energy companies and developers (reduced competition from new gas infrastructure); environmental consulting and legal firms (increased demand for GHG quantification and mitigation pla; community advocacy organizations (formalized role in environmental justice assessment)