Government races to upgrade encryption before quantum computers break it
S. 3312 — Quantum Readiness and Innovation Act of 2025 · Filed by Gary Peters (D-MI) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Dec 2, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop guidance for upgrading computer systems to post-quantum cryptography—encryption resistant to future quantum computers—and requires the Office of Science and Technology Policy to create a national upgrade strategy and pilot program. Federal agencies, critical infrastructure operators, and private companies will receive technical assistance and standards to transition their systems before quantum computers become powerful enough to break current encryption.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is mandating federal guidance and coordination for a specific, technically defined cybersecurity upgrade (post-quantum cryptography). It is not a subsidy, carve-out, or deregulation—it is a public-sector coordination and standard-setting measure addressing a known future threat.
What the text implies
- The bill references NIST standards (FIPS 203, 204, 140-3) and NSM-22 by date and publication number, locking in specific technical choices. Future changes to those standards or definitions would require legislative amendment, potentially slowing adaptation if threat landscape shifts.
- Pilot program requires at least one high-impact system upgrade within 18 months, but does not mandate full agency compliance or set a deadline for government-wide transition. Agencies may participate selectively, leaving some critical systems unupgraded for years.
- Private sector participation is voluntary and coordinated through the Quantum Economic Development Consortium. Smaller companies and critical infrastructure operators outside that consortium may lack access to federal technical support, creating a two-tier adoption landscape.
- The bill does not appropriate funds for the guidance development, pilot program, or technical assistance. Implementation depends on NIST and OSTP absorbing costs within existing budgets or seeking supplemental appropriations, which may delay or limit scope.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens depend on secure government and critical infrastructure systems (power grids, water systems, financial networks, healthcare). This bill accelerates preparation for a genuine future threat (quantum computing) by providing technical standards and federal coordination, reducing the window of vulnerability when adversaries could decrypt sensitive data retroactively. The guidance is made available to private sector at no cost, spreading security benefits broadly.
Who stands to gain
- quantum-resistant cryptography vendors and software providers
- cybersecurity consulting firms specializing in cryptographic migration
- hardware manufacturers producing quantum-resistant cryptographic modules
- federal contractors supporting NIST test beds and interoperability frameworks
Named in the bill
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Quantum Economic Development Consortium, Federal agencies, Critical infrastructure sectors, Sector risk management agencies, Department of Homeland Security
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Dec 2, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Dec 2, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $120,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 23 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Gary Peters, the sponsor, reported $-186,100 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Security Fund — $60,000 on 2 filings
- American Security Fund — $60,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (9,747 characters) on May 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Government races to upgrade encryption before quantum computers break it” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3312 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.