Congress mandates Big Tech share research data with independent academics
S. 3292 — Platform Accountability and Transparency Act · Filed by Christopher Coons (D-DE) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Dec 1, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal research program allowing independent academics and nonprofit researchers to access data from large social media platforms (50M+ US users) for studying platform impacts on society, with strict privacy protections and FTC oversight. It also requires platforms to publicly disclose information about content moderation, advertising, algorithms, and highly-shared content, and protects journalists and researchers from platform lawsuits when collecting publicly visible information for reporting.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory data-access regime for independent researchers plus public disclosure requirements for platforms. It is fundamentally a transparency and accountability measure, not a subsidy, carve-out, or commemorative act.
What the text implies
- Section 8's safe harbor for researchers and journalists collecting publicly visible data may enable large-scale scraping of platform content without platform consent, potentially straining platform infrastructure and creating liability questions for researchers who misidentify individuals.
- Section 3(e) bars judicial review of NSF/FTC decisions on qualified research projects, removing a check on agency discretion and potentially limiting researcher recourse if projects are denied on unstated grounds.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
academic institutions and nonprofit research organizations (data access, research funding); journalism organizations (safe harbor from platform litigation)