Congress names health accounts after sitting president, restricts abortion and gender care.
S. 3264 — More Affordable Care Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 20, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows states to opt out of major Affordable Care Act requirements (like coverage mandates and subsidies) if they establish a high-risk insurance pool. Instead of traditional subsidies, eligible residents in waiver states receive deposits into new 'Trump Health Freedom Accounts'—tax-advantaged accounts similar to health savings accounts. The bill also expands small-business tax credits in waiver states and requires better price transparency in healthcare. Critically, it restricts these accounts from paying for gender transition procedures or abortion services.
Why we flagged it
The bill's primary function is to allow states to dismantle ACA protections via waivers and redirect subsidies into named accounts with explicit ideological restrictions on use. While framed as 'health freedom,' the mechanism is a structural dismantling of existing coverage guarantees paired with a named account that serves as a political marker.
- Section 5 (price reporting and outcomes data) is substantively unrelated to the waiver/account structure and appears grafted on as a separate policy objective.
What the text implies
- Waiver states may see a two-tiered insurance market: high-risk pools for the sickest (potentially underfunded) and commercial platforms for healthier enrollees, fragmenting risk pools and destabilizing premiums for remaining ACA enrollees.
- The 'money follows the person' mechanism calculates subsidies based on national silver-plan averages, not state-specific costs; states with higher premiums may see residents receive inadequate account deposits, forcing out-of-pocket spending.
- Restrictions on account use for gender transition and abortion services may expose states to legal challenge under equal-protection and religious-freedom doctrines, creating litigation risk and administrative burden.
- Private commercial platforms operating exchanges (instead of traditional state/federal exchanges) may lack transparency requirements and consumer protections currently mandated under ACA exchange rules.
- The bill does not explicitly preserve mental-health parity or preventive-care coverage mandates in waiver states, potentially allowing states to waive these protections indirectly.
Who it affects
While price transparency is a public benefit, the core mechanism—allowing states to waive ACA protections in exchange for account-based subsidies—shifts risk from insurers to individuals and likely reduces coverage protections. The restriction on account use for gender transition and abortion services narrows healthcare access for specific populations. Individuals in waiver states lose guaranteed coverage standards and cost-sharing protections, trading them for accounts that may not cover all me
Who stands to gain
- health insurance companies (reduced regulatory burden, ability to exit high-risk markets)
- private exchange platforms (new commercial market opportunity)
- health savings account administrators (expanded account base)
- high-income individuals (HSA-like accounts with fewer contribution limits)
Named in the bill
HHS Secretary, Treasury Secretary, State governors and legislatures, State insurance commissioners, Private exchange platforms, Health insurance issuers, Trump Health Freedom Accounts, High-risk insurance pools, Federal and State Exchanges, Section 1335 (new waiver authority), Section 223 (HSA/account rules), Section 45R (small-business credits) — and 1 more
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Republicans.
- Nov 20, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Nov 20, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,609,666 in lobbying spend. A filing names 32 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Rick Scott, the sponsor, reported $69,750 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Pharmaceutical Care Management Association — $3,189,666 on 1 filing
- Susan B Anthony List — $420,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress names health accounts after sitting president, restricts abortion and gender care.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3264 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.