QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

FDA gains $5M more annually to inspect food; small businesses get partial fee relief

S. 3252 — FSMA Fee Technical Corrections Act · Filed by Richard Durbin (D-IL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 20, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
FDA Fee Authorization & Technical Correction

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill clarifies and updates the FDA's authority to charge reinspection and recall fees to food facilities and importers under the Food Safety Modernization Act. It sets base fees at $15,000 (adjusted annually for inflation starting in 2026), reduces fees to one-third for small businesses, and raises the annual cap on total fee collections from $20–25 million to $25–30 million. The bill also defines key terms like 'reinspection,' 'importer,' and 'small business' to remove ambiguity in how and when fees apply.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to clarify and expand the FDA's existing fee-collection authority under FSMA, raising fee caps and defining terms. It is a technical correction to existing law, not a new regulatory regime, though it does increase the financial burden on regulated entities.

What the text implies

  • Fee increases may disproportionately burden small food importers and domestic producers, potentially consolidating market share among larger competitors who can absorb compliance costs more easily.
  • The $25–30M annual fee cap (up from $20–25M) represents a 25% increase in FDA food-safety funding, but the bill does not specify how the FDA will allocate these additional resources or whether they will be used for preventive inspections or reactive recalls.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

FDA (increased fee revenue for food-safety operations); Large food manufacturers and importers (economies of scale reduce per-unit compliance cost); Food-safety consulting firms (may see increased demand for compliance guidance)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record