Congress restores court access for race discrimination claims
S. 3243 — Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025 · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 20, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits employers and other entities from forcing workers to sign agreements that require them to arbitrate race discrimination claims in private arbitration instead of court. It allows employees alleging race, color, or national origin discrimination to choose to take their case to court rather than be bound by pre-dispute arbitration clauses, and requires courts (not arbitrators) to decide whether the law applies.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restore judicial access for race discrimination claims by voiding forced arbitration agreements. It is a straightforward civil rights measure that removes a procedural barrier to justice, not a tax provision, subsidy, or regulatory carve-out.
What the text implies
- Increases litigation volume in federal and state courts, potentially straining judicial resources and lengthening case backlogs in civil rights dockets.
- May increase legal costs for employers defending discrimination claims in court (discovery, depositions, jury trials) versus arbitration, potentially affecting hiring and settlement behavior.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
plaintiff employment attorneys; civil rights law firms; workers alleging race discrimination