Congress orders federal broadband programs to stop duplicating each other
S. 323 — PLAN for Broadband Act · Filed by Roger Wicker (R-MS) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Commerce Department's Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information to develop a National Strategy and Implementation Plan to coordinate federal broadband programs across 15 agencies, eliminate duplication, streamline permitting for broadband infrastructure, and improve program efficiency. The strategy must identify gaps, set performance measures, recommend legislative fixes, and address Tribal broadband access—with a Government Accountability Office review to follow.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to mandate a federal strategy and implementation plan for synchronizing broadband programs across multiple agencies. It is a governance and planning instrument, not a funding bill or deregulation measure.
What the text implies
- Section 8 amends the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act to require federal agencies to track and report on processing delays for communications use applications (e.g., tower permits), potentially exposing bottlenecks in infrastructure deployment but also creating new reporting burdens.
- Section 9 redefines 'minimum broadband project cost' under the FAST Act to include projects over $5M involving broadband infrastructure subject to NEPA review, which may trigger additional environmental review requirements for some broadband deployments.
- The bill's emphasis on 'technological neutrality' and avoiding subsidies to already-served areas may constrain future federal broadband programs to avoid funding private-sector competition, indirectly protecting incumbent providers' market positions.
- The requirement to use the Deployment Locations Map and common data sets across agencies could expose gaps in federal broadband coverage data, potentially embarrassing agencies and creating pressure for legislative fixes that favor certain deployment models.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates transparency and coordination mechanisms for federal broadband spending, potentially reducing waste and duplication while improving access to underserved areas including Tribal lands. However, it is primarily a planning and coordination mandate with no direct funding or enforcement power, so benefits depend on implementation.
Who stands to gain
- broadband infrastructure contractors and engineering firms
- telecommunications service providers (through reduced permitting delays and clearer deployment rules
- technology-neutral broadband equipment manufacturers
Named in the bill
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information, Federal Communications Commission, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Department of Agriculture, Department of Transportation, Department of Interior, Appalachian Regional Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, Northern Border Regional Commission, Government Accountability Office, Deployment Locations Map — and 4 more
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 2 Democrats.
- Jan 29, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jan 29, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
- Mar 12, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment favorably”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
4 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $4,455,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 28 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 72% of bills with at least one filing.
Roger Wicker, the sponsor, reported $116,200 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- AT&T Services Inc and Its Affiliates — $2,650,000 on 1 filing
- Bnsf Railway Company — $960,000 on 1 filing
- United States Telecom Assn — $620,000 on 1 filing
- Wta -- Advocates for Rural Broadband — $225,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (16,923 characters) on Jun 8, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress orders federal broadband programs to stop duplicating each other” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s323 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.