Congress funnels $160M in visa fees to tourism marketer, bypassing spending caps
S. 3220 — VISIT USA Act · Filed by Dan Sullivan (R-AK) · 9 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 19, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill transfers $160 million in unspent visa-fee revenue from the Travel Promotion Fund to Brand USA, a nonprofit corporation that markets U.S. tourism internationally. The transfer bypasses the normal statutory cap on such transfers and requires Brand USA to meet matching-fund requirements. The money comes from fees already collected from visa applicants.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to redirect existing visa-fee revenue from a statutory fund to a specific nonprofit tourism marketer, bypassing normal transfer caps. This is a reallocation of public revenue, not a new appropriation or tax change.
What the text implies
- The $160M transfer exempts Brand USA from the statutory cap on Travel Promotion Fund transfers, potentially establishing a precedent for future cap-exempt transfers and weakening the original statutory control mechanism.
- Visa-fee revenue is being diverted from its original statutory purpose (travel promotion via the Fund) to a single nonprofit intermediary, concentrating discretion over public revenue in Brand USA's hands rather than Treasury or Congress.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
Brand USA (Corporation for Travel Promotion); tourism industry (hotels, airlines, attractions); international travel and hospitality sectors