QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

FDA gets sweeping power to destroy imports with minimal oversight

S. 3213 — Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 19, 2025 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
FDA Import Authority Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands the FDA's power to destroy imported goods that are refused entry into the U.S. Currently, the FDA can destroy certain refused drugs and devices; this bill extends that authority to any article (food, cosmetics, supplements, etc.) that the FDA Secretary determines presents a significant public health concern. It also makes it illegal to move or sell an article that the FDA has decided to destroy.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward expansion of existing FDA destruction authority over refused imports. It is not deregulation, not a carve-out, and not a rider — it is a direct grant of new discretionary power to a federal agency.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define 'significant public health concern' — the FDA Secretary's determination is the sole standard, with no requirement to publish reasoning, consult stakeholders, or provide notice to affected importers before destruction.
  • No appeal or administrative review process is established; importers have no statutory right to contest a destruction decision or recover losses.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who it affects

Citizens benefit from faster removal of genuinely hazardous imports (contaminated food, counterfeit medicines, unsafe products). However, the bill grants the FDA Secretary broad discretion to declare an article a public health concern with no defined standard, no mandatory notice to importers, no appeal process, and no requirement to publish findings — creating risk of arbitrary destruction and potential trade friction without transparency.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record