Congress claims power to block domestic troop deployments—after they start
S. 3167 — No Troops in Our Streets Act of 2025 · Filed by Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Nov 7, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal law to give Congress a fast-track mechanism to block military deployments within the United States by joint resolution of disapproval, and separately to terminate National Guard activations under federal control. It also appropriates $800 million to state and local law enforcement for grants, community violence prevention, and emergency assistance—but explicitly prohibits using any of that money to station federal law enforcement personnel in states and localities.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a procedural check on executive military authority (disapproval resolution) paired with a one-time appropriation to state/local law enforcement. The title accurately reflects the core intent: preventing federal troops from being deployed domestically without congressional recourse.
What the text implies
- The disapproval mechanism is reactive, not preventive—Congress can only terminate a deployment after it has begun, not block it in advance. The bill does not require advance authorization for domestic deployments.
- The $800M appropriation is one-time (FY 2026) and does not establish ongoing funding. State and local law enforcement agencies may face a cliff when the money expires.
- The prohibition on federal law enforcement assignment may be circumvented if federal personnel are 'detailed' or 'loaned' rather than formally 'assigned,' creating a potential loophole.
- The bill does not define 'deployment' or 'Armed Forces' in the domestic context, leaving ambiguity about whether National Guard under state control, federal contractors, or other armed federal personnel fall within the scope.
- The joint resolution procedure bypasses normal appropriations and budget rules by designating funds as 'emergency,' potentially setting a precedent for future emergency spending outside normal fiscal constraints.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens congressional oversight of domestic military deployments—a genuine democratic accountability gain—and funds state/local law enforcement without federal takeover. However, the appropriations are one-time (FY 2026 only) and modest relative to the stated problem, and the bill's core mechanism (disapproval authority) does not prevent deployments, only allows Congress to terminate them after the fact.
Who stands to gain
- state and local law enforcement agencies
- community violence intervention organizations
- law enforcement hiring programs
Named in the bill
Congress, Senate Committee on Armed Services, House Committee on Armed Services, Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant program, Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Justice Assistance Act of 1984, National Guard
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 4 Democrats.
- Nov 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Nov 7, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Mar 2026. Those filings disclosed $2,000,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 45 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Elissa Slotkin, the sponsor, reported $43,550 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Friends Committee on National Legislation — $2,000,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jun 15, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,515 characters) on Aug 15, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Mar 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jun 15, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress claims power to block domestic troop deployments—after they start” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3167 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.