Affordable Housing Bill Quietly Targets Construction Worker Wages
S. 3092 — Affordable Housing Expansion Act · Filed by Jerry Moran (R-KS) · Introduced Nov 3, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill modifies how prevailing wage rates are calculated for federally funded affordable housing projects under the Davis-Bacon Act. It allows wage determinations to be based on broader geographic areas (like metropolitan regions) rather than just local civil subdivisions, changes how wage surveys are conducted to include more businesses, and establishes a working group to study whether prevailing wage requirements could be waived or streamlined for certain affordable housing projects. The bill's core effect is to potentially lower labor costs on federally funded housing by making wage floors more flexible and easier to reduce.
Why we flagged it
Despite its title emphasizing 'affordable housing expansion,' the bill's operative provisions focus on modifying prevailing wage calculations and establishing a pathway to waive or streamline wage protections. The affordable housing framing masks a labor-cost containment agenda.
What the text implies
- The working group's authority to recommend wage waivers for 'certain affordable rental FHA new construction projects' creates a mechanism for selective exemption from prevailing wage law, potentially establishing precedent for broader erosion of Davis-Bacon protections.
- Allowing wage determinations based on metropolitan statistical areas rather than local subdivisions may systematically depress wages in lower-cost regions by importing wage data from higher-wage urban centers, then applying the lower regional average back to all projects.
- The bill's requirement that survey methodology improve 'proportional representation' of non-union businesses in prevailing wage surveys may bias wage determinations downward by overweighting non-union wage data, which typically reflects lower compensation.
- The working group explicitly considers transferring prevailing wage determination from the Department of Labor to the Bureau of Labor Statistics—a shift that could depoliticize the process but also remove labor-focused oversight and make future wage reductions appear 'technical' rather than policy-driven.
- By limiting wage rate determinations to a single rate per project (rather than multiple rates for different worker classifications), the bill may compress wage differentiation and reduce compensation for specialized trades.
Who it affects
Construction workers on federally funded affordable housing projects face potential wage reductions through broader geographic wage averaging and possible future waivers of prevailing wage protections. While lower construction costs may theoretically reduce housing prices, the bill's primary mechanism is to reduce worker compensation—a direct cost to the workers themselves—with uncertain and delayed benefits to future homebuyers.
Who stands to gain
- residential real estate investment trusts (REITs)
- housing construction companies
- affordable housing developers
- financial services firms involved in housing finance
Named in the bill
Department of Labor, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Davis-Bacon Act, National Housing Act, Housing Act of 1959, Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996, Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, US Housing Act of 1937, Federal Housing Administration, EXR (Extra Space Storage), EQR (Equity Residential) — and 2 more
Where it stands
- Nov 3, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Nov 3, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,230,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 53 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Jerry Moran, the sponsor, reported $396,550 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Mortgage Bankers Association — $1,220,000 on 1 filing
- City of Santa Clara — $10,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Affordable Housing Bill Quietly Targets Construction Worker Wages” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s3092 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.