Congress expands deposit insurance—but mainly for big business accounts
S. 2999 — Main Street Depositor Protection Act · Filed by Bill Hagerty (R-TN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Oct 9, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill expands federal deposit insurance to cover up to $10 million per depositor in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts (checking accounts that pay no interest) at banks and credit unions, beyond the current $250,000 standard limit. The expansion phases in over 10 years and exempts small banks (under $10 billion in assets) from paying special insurance assessments during the transition, while excluding accounts at systemically important banks and foreign bank branches.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is straightforward—extending FDIC/NCUA insurance to noninterest-bearing accounts up to $10M—but it bundles a selective cost-shifting provision (assessment exemption for small banks) that narrows the public benefit and creates a subsidy within the insurance system.
What the text implies
- Small banks (under $10B assets) avoid special assessments during the 10-year transition, shifting insurance fund costs to larger institutions and potentially to their depositors through higher fees or lower rates.
- The $10M cap on noninterest-bearing account coverage primarily protects large commercial depositors, nonprofits, and government entities—not ordinary households—creating a two-tier insurance system favoring institutional depositors.
- Exclusion of systemically important banks from the expanded coverage may incentivize deposit flight from large banks to smaller institutions, concentrating risk in the smaller-bank sector during the transition period.
- The 10-year phase-in allows the FDIC to gradually adjust reserve ratios and assessments, but creates regulatory uncertainty and potential gaming of deposit timing across the transition window.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Small business owners and nonprofits holding large operational balances in checking accounts gain meaningful protection against bank failure, reducing systemic risk from concentrated deposits. However, the exemption from insurance assessments for small banks shifts costs to larger institutions and potentially to their depositors, while the $10 million cap primarily benefits large commercial entities rather than ordinary households.
Who stands to gain
- community banks and regional banks (under $10B assets, assessment relief)
- credit unions (parallel expanded coverage, assessment relief)
- large commercial depositors and institutional account holders
- nonprofits and government entities with large operational balances
Named in the bill
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), Federal Reserve (systemically important bank designations), insured depository institutions, bank holding companies, credit unions
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Oct 9, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Oct 9, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”
- Feb 5, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
9 lobbying clients named this bill on 12 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,756,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 4 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 89% of bills with at least one filing.
Bill Hagerty, the sponsor, reported $1,618,141 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $10,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Independent Community Bankers of America — $2,170,000 on 1 filing
- Citigroup Washington, Inc. — $1,330,000 on 1 filing
- Charles Schwab Corporation — $1,270,000 on 2 filings
- Financial Services Forum — $1,070,000 on 1 filing
- Western Alliance Bancorporation — $420,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (8,032 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress expands deposit insurance—but mainly for big business accounts” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2999 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.