QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Border bill quietly exempts DHS from Wilderness Act protections

S. 2967 — Border Lands Conservation Act · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Oct 2, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
48/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernBorder Enforcement with Environmental…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the Interior Department and Forest Service to build roads, install surveillance and barriers on federal lands within 1 mile of the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders, and grants DHS broad authority to conduct border enforcement activities—including vehicle use and aircraft operations—in wilderness areas normally protected from such intrusions. It also establishes a fuels-management program and requires reports on environmental damage allegedly caused by undocumented immigrants crossing federal lands.

Why we flagged it

The bill's primary mechanism is granting DHS exemptions from Wilderness Act protections and environmental restrictions on federal border lands. The secondary mechanism—fuels management and road building—is framed as environmental stewardship but is operationally subordinate to border enforcement priorities and explicitly coordinates with DHS.

What the text implies

  • Section 4 amendment to the Wilderness Act creates a blanket exemption for DHS from all wilderness protections (motor vehicles, aircraft, construction) with no sunset or geographic limit beyond 'international land borders'—potentially affecting vast tracts of protected land.
  • Section 5 prohibits Interior and Forest Service from 'impeding, prohibiting, or restricting' DHS activities within 100 miles of borders for 'search and rescue' or 'preventing unlawful entries'—language broad enough to override agency environmental review and land-management decisions.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Border security contractors (surveillance, barriers, detection systems); Construction and engineering firms (road and infrastructure building); Grazing permit holders and ranching operations

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record