QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Border wall funded by cutting tax credits for immigrant families

S. 293 — WALL Act of 2025 · Filed by Katie Britt (R-AL) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
55/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernBorder Wall Appropriation with Regressive…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill appropriates $25 billion for border wall construction and funds it by restricting tax credits for families who cannot provide valid Social Security numbers, imposing a $300-per-person filing fee on tax returns using ITINs (Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers), requiring E-Verify checks for federally funded housing and benefits programs, and increasing civil penalties for illegal entry and overstay to $3,000–$10,000 plus monthly overstay fines of $50 per month. The tax and benefit restrictions disproportionately affect immigrant families and mixed-status households.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a $25 billion appropriation for border wall construction, but it funds this by narrowing tax credits and benefits for low-income and immigrant families—a regressive offset strategy that concentrates costs on vulnerable populations rather than broad-based revenue measures.

  • Extensive amendments to tax code (child tax credit, EITC, education credits) and housing/benefits eligibility (E-Verify mandates) are substantively unrelated to border wall construction and appear designed to offset the $25B cost by restricting credits for non-SSN holders.

What the text implies

  • The $300 ITIN filing fee may deter tax compliance among immigrant workers, reducing federal revenue and increasing underground economy activity—the opposite of stated tax-collection intent.
  • E-Verify mandates for housing and benefits programs will create a de facto immigration enforcement apparatus within HUD and Social Security, shifting enforcement burden to housing agencies and benefit administrators without explicit immigration enforcement authority.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Border wall construction contractors (unnamed); E-Verify system operators and compliance vendors; Federal government (via reduced tax credit payouts and new ITIN filing fees)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record