Federal tax dollars now fund private schools—with no public oversight
S. 292 — Educational Choice for Children Act of 2025 · Filed by Bill Cassidy (R-LA) · 33 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 29, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a federal tax credit allowing individuals and corporations to deduct donations to nonprofit scholarship organizations that fund private and religious school tuition for low-income students (up to 300% of area median income). Individuals can claim up to $5,000 or 10% of AGI annually; corporations can claim 5% of taxable income. The bill caps total annual credits at $10 billion, allocated first-come-first-serve, and includes provisions barring government control over participating schools and scholarship organizations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a federal tax credit that reduces government revenue and channels it to private and religious schools through nonprofit intermediaries. Despite the 'educational choice' framing, the primary effect is a tax expenditure benefiting private institutions and their donors.
- Section 5(4) grants parents of scholarship recipients standing to intervene in any state or federal court challenge to the bill's constitutionality—a procedural provision unrelated to the tax credit mechanism itself, inserted to preempt legal challenges.
What the text implies
- The $10 billion annual cap is allocated first-come-first-serve with no geographic equity requirement, meaning wealthy states and early filers will exhaust the cap, leaving low-income families in other states without access.
- Scholarship organizations are permitted to carry over up to 15% of receipts annually and have until the third year to distribute funds, creating a de facto endowment that reduces actual scholarship distribution and accountability.
- The 10% administrative expense safe harbor is unusually high for charitable organizations, potentially allowing significant overhead while claiming compliance.
- Section 5 prohibits government entities from controlling or directing scholarship organizations or schools, creating a parallel education system insulated from civil rights enforcement, special education requirements, and transparency standards.
- The bill exempts scholarship amounts from the recipient's gross income (Section 4), creating a second tax benefit on top of the donor credit, effectively doubling the subsidy.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill diverts federal tax revenue (approximately $10 billion annually) from the general treasury to subsidize private and religious school attendance for a subset of low-income families, weakening public school funding and creating a two-tiered education system. While framed as expanding 'choice,' the mechanism is a tax expenditure that benefits private institutions and donors at public expense, with no requirement that scholarship organizations serve all eligible students or that schools rec
Who stands to gain
- private and religious schools
- high-income donors claiming tax credits
- nonprofit scholarship intermediaries
- educational service providers (tutoring, testing prep)
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Service, Scholarship granting organizations, Private and religious elementary and secondary schools, Nonprofit organizations (501(c)(3)), Individual taxpayers, Corporate taxpayers, States and District of Columbia
Where it stands
33 cosponsors: 33 Republicans.
- Jan 29, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jan 29, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 4 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $100,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 50 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Bill Cassidy, the sponsor, reported $1,329,254 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Invest in Education Coalition — $60,000 on 1 filing
- Invest in Education Coalition — $20,000 on 1 filing
- National Council of Jewish Women — $20,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (20,960 characters) on Aug 24, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal tax dollars now fund private schools—with no public oversight” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s292 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.