Federal highway funds now tied to climate targets, transit investment
S. 2890 — GREEN Streets Act · Filed by Ed Markey (D-MA) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 18, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal transportation law to require states and metropolitan areas to consider greenhouse gas emissions and climate resilience when planning road projects, and to prioritize transit, biking, and walking infrastructure over highway expansion. It mandates that states failing to meet emissions targets must spend at least 33% of certain highway funds on transit, active transportation, and land-use projects instead, with the percentage increasing 2% annually until targets are met.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory shift in how federal transportation funds are allocated: states must prioritize emissions reduction and transit over highway expansion, with escalating financial penalties for missing climate targets. This is substantive transportation policy reform, not a narrow carve-out or commemorative measure.
What the text implies
- States with poor transit infrastructure face immediate 33% fund reallocation, potentially stranding rural/exurban areas dependent on cars unless they rapidly build alternatives—implementation burden falls on states with least capacity.
- The 2% annual increase in required spending (33% → 35% → 37%, etc.) could eventually consume most highway funding, forcing states to choose between maintenance and new projects; long-term fiscal impact on state DOTs unclear.
- Environmental justice analysis requirement may expose decades of highway-induced pollution in low-income communities, creating political pressure for remediation but no dedicated funding mechanism.
- Definition of 'covered project' ($25M+ federal funds or any capacity-adding project) is broad; even modest road improvements may trigger analysis and spending requirements, increasing compliance costs.
- Transit accessibility standards are new federal mandates on metro areas; rural and tribal communities get technical assistance only, creating a two-tier system and potential equity concerns.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill shifts federal transportation investment toward public transit, walking, and biking infrastructure while constraining highway expansion unless states meet climate targets. This expands mobility options for non-drivers, reduces air pollution in overburdened communities, and addresses climate emissions—benefits that accrue broadly to citizens. The requirement to analyze environmental justice impacts before approving major projects adds transparency and protects vulnerable communities.
Who stands to gain
- public transit agencies
- active transportation infrastructure contractors
- land-use development firms (transit-oriented development)
- micromobility service providers
- engineering/planning consultants (analysis and reporting)
Named in the bill
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), State Departments of Transportation, Access Board, Environmental justice communities, Tribal and Indigenous communities
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Sep 18, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Sep 18, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $180,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 6 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Ed Markey, the sponsor, reported $658,450 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Cobank — $180,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 10, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (19,338 characters) on Sep 28, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 10, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal highway funds now tied to climate targets, transit investment” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2890 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.