QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress authorizes study of historic Shaker village for heritage designation

S. 2801 — Canterbury Shaker Village National Heritage Area Study Authorization Act · Filed by Maggie Hassan (D-NH) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 15, 2025 · Reported out

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Heritage Site Study Authorization

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to study whether Canterbury Shaker Village in New Hampshire—a 700-acre historic site with 25 buildings, now a nonprofit museum—should be designated as a National Heritage Area. The study will assess suitability and feasibility in consultation with state, local, and historical organizations. No funding is appropriated, no land is acquired, and no designation occurs unless Congress acts again after the study is complete.

Why we flagged it

The bill's sole operative mechanism is a directive to the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study for a National Heritage Area designation. It is a straightforward authorization for administrative study, not a substantive policy change or appropriation.

What the text implies

  • A successful study and subsequent National Heritage Area designation could increase federal funding eligibility for preservation, tourism infrastructure, and educational programming at the site, though this bill does not appropriate funds.
  • National Heritage Area status may enhance the nonprofit museum's ability to attract grants and donations by raising the site's national profile.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Canterbury Shaker Village, Inc. (nonprofit museum operator); New Hampshire tourism and hospitality sector (potential indirect benefit from increased visitation)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record