Smart devices must disclose cameras and mics before you buy
S. 28 — Informing Consumers about Smart Devices Act · Filed by Ted Cruz (R-TX) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 7, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires manufacturers of internet-connected devices (like smart speakers, security cameras, or smart TVs) to clearly disclose before purchase whether the device contains a camera or microphone. The FTC enforces the rule by treating violations as unfair or deceptive trade practices, with manufacturers given 180 days after FTC guidance to comply. Phones, laptops, tablets, and devices consumers would reasonably expect to have cameras or mics are exempt.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a mandatory pre-purchase disclosure requirement for camera and microphone capabilities in smart devices, enforced by the FTC as an unfair/deceptive practice violation. It is a straightforward consumer protection measure with no carve-outs or industry exemptions.
What the text implies
- Manufacturers may respond by using vague or technical language in disclosures; FTC guidance (due 180 days post-enactment) will be critical to ensuring disclosures are genuinely 'clear and conspicuous' rather than buried in fine print.
- The exemption for devices 'a consumer would reasonably expect' to have cameras/mics is subjective and may create enforcement disputes (e.g., is a smart doorbell 'reasonably expected' to have a camera?).
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary consumers gain transparency about surveillance capabilities in devices they buy, enabling informed choice and reducing hidden data collection. The bill imposes no new costs on consumers and creates no liability shields or exemptions that would weaken existing protections.