Congress redirects $1B+ in airline fees from Treasury to TSA
S. 2795 — FASTER Act · Filed by Ed Markey (D-MA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 11, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill changes how aviation security fees collected from airline passengers are handled. Currently, a portion of these fees must be credited back to the general Treasury fund; this bill repeals that requirement so that 100% of security fees collected from passengers stay in a dedicated account available only for aviation security screening costs. The effect is to redirect money that would otherwise go to the general Treasury back into TSA operations.
Why we flagged it
The bill mechanically redirects existing passenger-paid security fees from the general Treasury to a dedicated TSA account. It is not a new tax, subsidy, or appropriation—it is a reallocation of revenue already collected, changing only the destination and availability rules.
What the text implies
- Removes Treasury's ability to use aviation security fee revenue to offset other budget items, potentially increasing pressure to cut other programs or raise revenue elsewhere to maintain fiscal balance.
- Grants TSA spending authority 'notwithstanding any other law,' including the Anti-Deficiency Act, which may reduce congressional oversight of TSA budget execution and spending discipline.
- Creates a permanent dedicated revenue stream for TSA independent of annual appropriations, shifting control of aviation security funding from Congress to fee collection and TSA discretion.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Passengers benefit from potentially more stable, better-funded aviation security screening. However, the bill reduces general Treasury revenue by an estimated $1–2 billion annually (the amount previously credited), which must be offset elsewhere—either through higher taxes, reduced services, or increased deficits. The net civic effect depends on whether TSA funding improves enough to justify the Treasury loss and whether that loss is absorbed by cuts to other public programs.
Who stands to gain
- Transportation Security Administration (federal agency)
Named in the bill
TSA (Transportation Security Administration), Title 49 United States Code, Title 31 United States Code, Anti-Deficiency Act, U.S. Treasury
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Sep 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Sep 11, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,250 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress redirects $1B+ in airline fees from Treasury to TSA” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2795 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.