National Park opens doors to private events—but only one nonprofit gets the key
S. 2767 — Gateway Partnership Act · Filed by Eric Schmitt (R-MO) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Sep 11, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to sign a five-year agreement with the Gateway Arch Park Foundation (a nonprofit partner of the park) to host private events in Gateway Arch National Park buildings, including the Arch Visitor Center and Old Courthouse. The Foundation must carry liability insurance, pay fees to cover maintenance and operational costs, and events cannot disrupt public access or degrade the park's integrity. The agreement expires after seven years, and the Secretary must report on its impacts after four years.
Why we flagged it
The bill establishes a limited, time-bound agreement between a federal agency and a nonprofit foundation to monetize park facilities through private events while maintaining public access and cost recovery. It is neither a pure public-interest measure nor a corporate giveaway, but a managed partnership with explicit safeguards.
What the text implies
- The Foundation gains exclusive event-hosting rights in specified park buildings, potentially crowding out other nonprofits, community groups, or individuals seeking to rent the same spaces for private events.
- Cost recovery is discretionary ('may recover all costs') rather than mandatory, creating ambiguity about whether the park will actually break even or whether taxpayers will subsidize the Foundation's use.
- The agreement is one-time and non-renewable by statute, but the Foundation's status as the 'official philanthropic partner' may create political pressure to extend or renew the arrangement beyond the seven-year sunset.
- Private events in the Visitor Center and Old Courthouse during exclusive-use windows may reduce public access to those buildings during peak tourism periods, even though the bill nominally protects public access.
- The Secretary has broad discretion to define 'any other terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate,' potentially allowing future administrations to expand the Foundation's privileges beyond what the statute explicitly permits.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens retain guaranteed public access and the park recovers operational costs from private events, which may reduce taxpayer burden. However, the bill grants a single nonprofit exclusive event-hosting rights in public buildings, potentially limiting other organizations' or citizens' ability to use those spaces for private events, and the cost-recovery mechanism may not fully offset all impacts on park operations and visitor experience.
Who stands to gain
- Gateway Arch Park Foundation (exclusive event-hosting rights, reduced operational burden through fee
Named in the bill
Gateway Arch Park Foundation, Gateway Arch National Park, Secretary of the Interior, National Park Service, Arch Visitor Center, Old Courthouse, Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, House Committee on Natural Resources
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Sep 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Sep 11, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
- Jul 21, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held”
- Jul 29, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $139,430 in lobbying spend. A filing names 46 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Eric Schmitt, the sponsor, reported $274,099 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- National Parks Conservation Association — $139,430 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,454 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“National Park opens doors to private events—but only one nonprofit gets the key” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2767 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.