Colorado town gets free reservoir—but inherits dam liability forever
S. 2754 — Crystal Reservoir Conveyance Act · Filed by Michael Bennet (D-CO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 10, 2025 · Passed chamber
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the U.S. Forest Service to transfer ownership of Crystal Reservoir (a 45-acre site in Colorado including the dam, lake, and water infrastructure) to the City of Ouray at no cost to the city. In exchange, Ouray must maintain the land as open space for public recreation, assume all costs for dam repairs and operations, and comply with water-law restrictions. The federal government retains easements for road and trail access and can reclaim the land if Ouray violates the terms.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a transfer of federal real property and water rights to a municipal government, coupled with a shift of perpetual maintenance and regulatory liability from the federal government to the city. This is a property disposition, not a subsidy or deregulation.
What the text implies
- Ouray assumes perpetual liability for Full Moon Dam safety and regulatory compliance under federal dam-safety law; if the city cannot afford repairs or fails to meet standards, the federal government may face pressure to intervene or the dam may become unsafe.
- The reversionary clause (subsection e(4)) allows the federal government to reclaim the land if Ouray violates terms, but enforcement depends on federal monitoring and discretion—a weak safeguard if the city's use drifts.
- Water rights transfer includes decrees from 1942 and 2013; Ouray gains control over water allocation and storage, potentially affecting downstream users and state water-law compliance.
- The perpetual public-access requirement and no-development covenant run with the land in perpetuity; future Ouray administrations cannot monetize or develop the site without federal consent, limiting the city's long-term fiscal flexibility.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ouray residents and Colorado water users gain a valuable asset and perpetual public recreation access at no user fee, but the city assumes significant long-term financial and legal liability for dam safety, repairs, and regulatory compliance—a substantial ongoing cost that may eventually burden taxpayers if the city cannot sustain it. The public benefit (free access, local control) is real but paired with a concrete private cost (Ouray's liability).
Who stands to gain
- City of Ouray, Colorado (receives valuable water infrastructure and land at no cost)
Named in the bill
City of Ouray, Colorado, U.S. Forest Service, Secretary of Agriculture, San Juan National Forest, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forest, Full Moon Dam, Crystal Reservoir, Red Mountain Ditch, State of Colorado (water law jurisdiction)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Sep 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Sep 10, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
- Feb 12, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held”
- Jul 16, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a…”
- Sep 30, 2026 — Passed the Senate · Congress.gov: “Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $570,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Michael Bennet, the sponsor, reported $21,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Arkema Inc. and Its Affiliates (fka Arkema Inc.) — $570,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,783 characters) on Jul 19, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Colorado town gets free reservoir—but inherits dam liability forever” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2754 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.