QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress quietly builds a deregulation machine for AI companies

S. 2750 — SANDBOX Act · Filed by Ted Cruz (R-TX) · Introduced Sep 10, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
45/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernRegulatory Sandbox with Deregulation Pathway

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal AI regulatory sandbox program run by the Office of Science and Technology Policy, allowing companies to test AI products and services under temporary waivers from federal regulations for up to 2 years (renewable for 4 additional 2-year periods). Applicants must demonstrate that benefits outweigh health, safety, economic, and consumer-protection risks; agencies have 90 days to approve or deny; the Director can appeal agency denials; and companies must disclose participation to consumers and report incidents within 72 hours. The program terminates after 12 years, and Congress can vote annually to repeal or amend regulations that the Director recommends be eliminated based on sandbox success.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a time-limited testing program, but its true functional character is revealed in Section 703: an annual congressional process that allows the Director to recommend permanent repeal or amendment of regulations based on sandbox performance, effectively converting temporary waivers into a deregulation engine.

What the text implies

  • Section 703 creates a fast-track deregulation pathway: the Director annually submits a list of regulations to repeal/amend based on sandbox success; Congress has only 60 legislative days to block via joint resolution. This inverts normal rulemaking—regulations are repealed unless Congress acts, not adopted unless Congress approves.
  • The 'deemed approval' provision (Section 702(5)(E)): if an agency does not submit a decision within 90 days (plus one 30-day extension), the Director presumes no objection and may grant the waiver. This creates a default-yes bias and incentivizes agency inaction.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

AI development companies (any size, any sector); Technology firms deploying AI products/services; AI infrastructure and software vendors

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record